UGG Tall Cooperative farmers to meet with parliamentary rules of procedure

Person in charge of agriculture cooperatives Nantang Yun standard that has been training since November last year, Nantang villagers have been able to learn and use the leadership from the CD, look at leadership wink) and good old culture (not to offend), it is difficult to solve. But the

meeting is a big problem

opening introduction when Yuan Tianpeng Robert Rules of Procedure, the uncle aunt around, but a moment, some people say: p>

Yun standard that they meet ah rural areas often have three questions. One, beside the point: what you say Jet Li, I wander Pig, not one side of the run. Second, lays down the law: Who is leading the rushing Wow that forever, a talk on the whole he spoke. Third, the savage controversy: a discussion of the problem, say so and so your character can not. One hundred people saying a word to seize and hold, or even fight.

how to solve the difficult problem of the meeting, someone introduced him to the Yuan Tianpeng studying in the United States. The Yuan Tianpeng brought in a Yuan Tianpeng pain after returning to the incompetence of the Chinese people to meet, set up a company devoted to the promotion from the rules of the British Parliament, Robert Rules of Procedure.

how to solve quarrels, brutal attack the problem? Cabbage and radish neutral host the first rule,UGG Tall, for the sides of the debate moderator, to avoid both direct debate. Statement that the two sides to the host, rather than challenge each other. There must be a show of hands rise to these actions, you can first stabilize mood; number of statements each person has provided, so that everyone has the opportunity; host to master the principle of proportionality, one speech,UGG Tall, sure to make the other speak.

Tuotang delay time can not speak, can not be forced to the floor, others can not be interrupted when speaking, as this is prohibited by the rules. There is not other people make moral judgments on the character.

Yuantian Peng said that the name can not be moral motives to suspect others, have a deeper philosophy behind the concept. As a confirmed motive is not something; second, the meeting was not to be considered a person, but something of the motives of doubt and to expose itself to the issue of deviation; third, self-interest is the nature of humanity, accusing the motives of others is meaningless in itself, not only can not solve the problem, but increased conflicts.

wanted to be good,

Yun piao: In our rural areas, meeting the vote is a big problem. There are two main problems: one is with the proposal, most people do not oppose or support, because the face, offends, so more than abstaining. Another is someone to speak first, three supported the meeting to vote on the one-sided, large slide along. Even bad posture do not agree with a look not say a word. Less able to insist on personal opinions. Slip along, how big do? Turnip cabbage clever design rules. This balance of voice to use to solve the rotation, so there is one-sided situation.

meeting old stray Editor's Note?

to stray from the rules of procedure, requiring debate are, first position, to say the reasons. Beginning, Yang Yun standard does not understand, I would like to say how to say how and why to be so. Later that makes sense, because the Chinese people are always scared sinners, always one to speak first pull away, to talk about the reasons, the final say who I support the view. Some tend to go around, the words were properly appropriateness posts. This efficiency is very low. Let me talk about their arguments, can improve the efficiency is not beside the point. According to the However, host presiding over a period not to express their views, we can not draw on the floor.

Article: Conference to discuss the content should be a clear motion, the motion must be specific, clear, actionable recommendations for action.

Third: who should raise their hands who preferred to speak, but speak the host to get permission to stand up, speak when others can not be interrupted.

Article: as much as possible to speak against the host, between different views to avoid direct face to face speech.

Article V: each person to speak for no more than two minutes each to speak for no more than the same move twice, or we can live requirements.

Article: discuss the problem can not be beside the point, the moderator should interrupt stray statement.

Article: host interrupt those who speak non-compliance, the person shall be suspended by interrupted speech.

Article VIII: The host should be as contrary to the opinion of both parties take turns to get the opportunity to speak,UGG Tall, in order to maintain balance.

Article IX: spokesman should first show in favor of or against, and then said it was because.

Article: Do not make personal attacks, only the sake of discussion.

Article XI: Only the host can be brought to a vote, only to wait until the number of statements have been exhausted, or no one think to speak, in order to draw votes. If the host has the right to vote, should the final vote. Prevent hold thick legs.

Article XII: moderator should ask the favor of the side show of hands, then please raise their hands against the side. But please do not raise the waiving party.

Article XIII: When in favor of the party than the opposition, the motion passed. Equal to not draw too.

Robert Rules of Procedure

comes to meeting the rules, I am afraid the world, comparable to the American rule that no one big. They have a thick layer of meeting rules - This is unique in the world. It is written by Henry Martin Robert, in 1876, published in 2000 after several revisions out of the tenth edition. Robert Rules of Procedure of the content is very detailed, all-inclusive, there are special stresses chairman of the meeting of the rules, the rules for the Secretary of the meeting, of course, a large number of participants is about the general rules, there are different views of the proposed rules and expression, the debate rules, there is a very important voting rules under different circumstances.